Life of Christ 155
It is Tuesday morning.
Jesus will die tomorrow afternoon. Already today we have seen His interaction
on the way to the Temple with the Apostles, the Greeks, and the crowd in
Jerusalem. There we saw the Father encourage Him audibly. On arriving in the
Temple, He begins to teach and is immediately hassled about His credentials by
representatives of the Sanhedrin. He deflects that by bringing up John the
Baptist and then proceeds to tell three parables that absolutely skewer the
Pharisees.
Today's story (Luke
20.20-26) follows hard on the heels of this last exchange. The Sanhedrin just
openly confronted Christ and was bested in the Jews favorite sport –
theological argument. Now, not wanting to risk looking that bad again they
decide to send other players against Him to see if He can be damaged in the
eyes of the people. And they watched him,
and sent forth spies, which should feign themselves just men, that they might
take hold of his words, that so they might deliver him unto the power and
authority of the governor. Like a chess player who conceals one move behind
another, the Sanhedrin moves into the shadows and begins to launch verbal
attacks at Christ via surrogates.
The Sanhedrin has long
been angry with Jesus yet beyond privately encouraging mob violence and
secretly conspiring to assassinate Him they have done little to physically harm
Him. The primary thing holding them back over the last few months from a more
aggressive posture against Christ was their perception that His popular support
was wide and deep. Realistically, it was rather shallow, as Wednesday’s events
would prove, but the Sanhedrin was not sure of this. What follows in our story
today flows from this misperception. The Sanhedrin hopes to cause either His
popular support to dwindle or to get Him in trouble with the Romans. If they
could accomplish the former it would make Him easier to kill on religious grounds.
If they could accomplish the latter the Romans just might do it for them.
Their question to Him
was downright ingenious. They ask Him if it was lawful for Rome to collect
taxes from them or not. Is it lawful for
us to give tribute to Caesar, or no? The Jewish people as a whole rejected
Rome’s right to collect taxes. This was not simply because of the tax burden
but because it implied they thus accepted the Roman Caesar as their legitimate
king. This was highly problematic to the Pharisees, the predominant religious
group in Israel, who insisted that Jehovah alone could be their king. On the
other hand, the Romans were known to deal harshly with those who publicly
rejected Rome’s right to rule or tax. They had recently killed Judas of Galilee
for just that very reason. (Acts 5.37)
The Pharisees were
joined in their question by the Herodians, a group who advocated acquiescence
to the rule of Rome. Normally they would take the opposite position to the
Pharisees on political questions, and the fact that they joined in with them on
this occasion added weight to the question placed before Christ. As well, we
must add to this the fact that Jesus is publicly proclaiming Himself to be
Israel’s messiah (which means her king as well). Now the simple question is
suddenly fraught with political, popular, and criminal overtones.
As the Sanhedrin saw it
Jesus had only two possible answers from which to choose and neither one was
pleasant. If He approves the payment of taxes He will alienate Himself from
popular support in Israel and undermine His own claim to be the Messiah and
King of Israel. On the other hand, if Jesus rejects the payment of taxes He
will call down the wrath of Rome on His head for stirring up sedition. What to
do?
Many people view His answer
as a clever evasion. While it was an evasion on the surface it is not so
underneath. Jesus’ admonition recognizes two distinct albeit occasionally overlapping
spheres of authority. One is political and earthly while the other is religious
and heavenly. In this He anticipates Paul’s later development in Romans 13.
There Paul explained that civil government itself is instituted by God and that
it has a legitimate role to play in life. Jesus recognized that Caesar had
God-given authority to collect taxes but that this authority did not conflict
with God’s kingdom or rule over the individual or society.
His answer is
breathtakingly wise. In one fell swoop He solves a continual conundrum at the
intersection of contemporary Jewish theology and politics. Along the way the
Sanhedrin discovers much to their chagrin that they failed in their aim. Jesus
did not get Himself in trouble with Rome, nor did He lose the respect of the
people. In fact, He gained respect. And
they could not take hold of his words before the people: and they marvelled at
his answer, and held their peace.
…and if you are scoring
along at home it is now Jesus two, the Sanhedrin zero.
No comments:
Post a Comment