Worship
is our response when we see God. In the Old Testament it was primarily done at
the location where God dwelt. With the advent of a new dispensation in the New
Testament worship transitioned away from being geographical. Now it did not
matter where you were you could still worship God. (I have a sneaking suspicion
that a bunch of people who will not agree with today's post won't bother to
take the time to read the other posts in this series which establish this
paragraph. I have a word for people like that – lazy.)
…all of which brings us to this
statement: the New Testament church service is not a
worship service. Yes. You read that correctly. The New Testament church
service is not a worship service. Yet around the corner from you is a church
with a marquee that says, '11 AM Worship Service' on it. In point of fact, your
church marquee probably says that. Worse yet, the vast majority of people in
your church believe that. They think they go to church to worship God. Indeed,
they think that is the very point of the church service. The stubborn truth is
that the church service was not designed or purposed to produce worship. God
does not live in a building. You do not need to go to a geographical location
to meet with Him.
Obviously, the vast majority of
Christianity, quote and otherwise, disagrees with me. I find talking to those
willing to talk about it to be an interesting activity. I often ask them to
take the Bible and show me the scriptural support for declaring the church
service to be a worship service. Right away they want to run to the Psalms or
Exodus or some such Old Testament reference. This is highly problematic for the
church is explicitly a New Testament institution. In fact, the New Testament
says the church was not even imagined in the Old Testament. I do not deny that
Christianity has its roots in Judaism, but it is hermeneutically unsound to use
Old Testament passages as the doctrinal support for your philosophical approach
to the church service. Otherwise I expect to see a lot of churches slaughtering
some animals at the altar next Sunday morning.
All over the Bible you will find
examples of people bowing down to someone who was a representative of God.
Balaam bowed to the angel after his donkey reprimanded him. Manoah bowed to the
angel after receiving news of Samson's arrival. David bowed to the angel sent
to destroy Jerusalem. Obadiah, Ahab's minister, bowed to Elijah. Nebuchadnezzar
bowed to Daniel. Daniel bowed to Gabriel. The wise men bent a knee before the
infant Jesus. Lepers bowed before Christ. Various demon possessed people bowed before
Christ. Jairus bowed before Christ. The woman with the issue of blood bowed
before Christ. A Greek woman bowed before Christ. The blind man in John 9 bowed before Christ. Cornelius
bowed to Peter. The Philippian jailer bowed before Paul and Silas. John twice
tried to bow before an angel in Revelation.
All of these people bowed
instinctually before someone they deemed as God or the representative of God. Paul's
statement in I Corinthians 14 about
the lost man falling down on his face
in worship during a church service is simply the 17th example of a
person in Scripture recognizing God was somehow in someone and responding with
worship. God is in you of a truth. The
simple truth is that this verse comes nowhere near stating that the church
service should be designed to produce worship.
Even if you discount my explanation of
I Corinthians 14.25 asserting it as
the foundational support for viewing the church service as a worship service is
still problematic. It certainly is not a clear statement of church service
purpose. It occurs in relation to the most disorganized, unruly church in the
entire Bible. And it only occurs once.
Further, to say that I Corinthians 14.25 establishes the cardinal rule that the church
service is a worship service brings an additional problem. Logically then it
makes the church service primarily evangelistic for it was a lost man who bowed
in worship. If I take this verse as the normative foundation for my
philosophical approach to church then my philosophical approach must primarily
be using the church service as a tool to reach the lost. Such an approach
violates the entire context of the rest of I
Corinthians 14. For instance, look at verse 22. Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to
them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not
for that believe not, but for them which believe. In other words,
the preaching of the sermon is designed to help believers not unbelievers.
Winning the lost to Christ is clearly the purpose of the church but it is just
as clearly not the purpose of the church service.
No, beloved, I Corinthians 14.25 cannot mean that the purpose of the church service
is worship. Such an interpretation violates our understanding of how and why
worship shifted between the Old Testament and the New Testament. God does not
live in a building. God is not in a geographical location. In the New Testament
we are indwelt by the Holy Spirit and thus we can worship God anywhere at any
time.
If worship is not the point of the New
Testament church service than what is the point? I am so glad you asked. The
point of the church service is spiritual growth. How is it then, brethren? When ye come together, every one of you hath
a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an
interpretation. Let all things be done unto
edifying. (I Corinthians 14.26) Even so ye, forasmuch as ye are zealous
of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the
edifying of the church. (I Corinthians 14.12) For thou verily givest
thanks well, but the other is not edified. (I Corinthians 14.17) The simple
truth is that in the chapter of the Bible that most discusses the church
service edify is used seven times and
worship is used once.
Some will say, 'Well, worship is
edifying.' I do not dispute that in the least, and if you take this post as a
screed against worship you do not know me at all. But I dare not make worship
the primary tool for edification in a New Testament church service. I do not
have the scriptural authority or example to do so.
What tools am I to use? How then am I
as a pastor to edify the saints who show up for a church service? First of all
via music. Again, I reference I
Corinthians 14.26. Psalms are to be sung as a means of edification. Let me
be explicitly clear – music in church was primarily designed to teach you and
grow you, not to help you worship God. Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual
songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord. (Ephesians
5.19) Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns
and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.
(Colossians 3.16) This is precisely because the service itself is primarily
designed to grow you spiritually. It is not designed to enable you to worship
God.
The second tool I am to use in
edifying the saints in a church service is the tool of preaching. But he that
prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and
comfort. He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth edifieth the church. I would
that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye
prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh
with tongues, except he interpret, that the church
may receive edifying. (I Corinthians 14.3-5) Yet
in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my
voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown
tongue. (I Corinthians 14.19) My understanding of the word prophesy here drives me to see it
primarily as preaching. As such, it is mentioned 14 times in this chapter. It
is highly emphasized. Wherefore,
brethren, covet to prophesy. (I Corinthians
14.39) Why? So that you might edify the brethren. So that they might learn
what God says in the Word. So that having been taught the truth they might grow
in grace. That is the point of the New Testament church service.
Next week I will lay that out for you.
See you then.
No comments:
Post a Comment