Monday, June 8, 2015

Alcohol 5 - Not for Kings

          The more responsibility you carry the more caution you should exercise about alcohol. If I give a dog a bowl of beer and he gets drunk he staggers around and amuses everyone. If I give a father several cans of beer he will eventually stagger around. If he does it often enough he will deprive his children and his wife of all that they need him to be. When you study drinking in the Bible this concept – that there is greater danger in it for those with greater responsibility – comes up again and again. Solomon said it well in Proverbs 31.4-5. It is not for kings, O Lemuel, it is not for kings to drink wine; nor for princes strong drink: Lest they drink, and forget the law, and pervert the judgment of any of the afflicted.


          The Old Testament contains four separate examples of the folly of kings and princes when it comes to alcohol. I Kings 16 tells us that King Elah of Israel was murdered while drinking himself drunk. This palace coup resulted in Elah's chariot captain, Zimri, becoming the next king. I wonder if Elah would have been able to defend himself if he hadn't been drinking.
Two chapters later we find the story of the Syrian king, Ben-Hadad. His army greatly outnumbered the Israelite army. Ben-Hadad marched to Samaria and demanded the right to search the Jewish kings house and take whatever he wanted. The king of Israel refused. Ben-Hadad, under the influence of alcohol, declared war. And it came to pass, when Benhadad heard this message, as he was drinking, he and the kings in his pavilion, that he said to his servants, Set yourselves in array. …And they went out at noon. But Benhadad was drinking himself drunk in the pavilions, he and the kings, the thirty and two kings that helped him. In this case a war entered into and fought by men well soused resulted in a stunning defeat for Syria. And the king of Israel went out, and smote the horses and chariots, and slew the Syrians with a great slaughter. I wonder how much different that battle would have turned out if the Syrian leadership wouldn't have been drinking.
King Ahasuerus of Persia made a snap decision to set aside one queen and find another. He made that decision under the influence of alcohol. The heart of the king was merry with wine. (Esther 1.10) In so doing he set on course a series of events that nearly resulted in the destruction of the Jews and did result in the death of his good friend, Haman. I wonder if he would have made the same decision to get rid of Vashti if he had not been drinking.
Amnon, a son of King David and thus a prince in Israel, raped his half-sister Tamar. When Amnon's brother, Absalom found out Absalom arranged Amnon's murder. Now Absalom had commanded his servants, saying, Mark ye now when Amnon's heart is merry with wine, and when I say unto you, Smite Amnon; then kill him, fear not: have not I commanded you? be courageous, and be valiant. (II Samuel 13.28) I wonder if Amnon would have lived longer and if Absalom would have been prevented from becoming a murderer if Amnon had chosen not to drink that night. I wonder how the course of Israel's history might have been changed if it were not for that one night of drinking.
These admonitions are not found alone in the Old Testament. In the New Testament the great John the Baptist was forbidden alcohol in an angelic message brought to his father Zechariah. Pastors likewise are explicitly warned. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God; not selfwilled, not soon angry; not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre. (Titus 1.7)   

Do you have a place of responsibility? Do others look to you as parent, teacher, boss, or leader? Does someone follow you? Do your decisions carry ramifications? Do you lead an important life? I say again what I have said before: When you combine a high level of responsibility with a beverage so notoriously deceptive perhaps the real question you need to ask yourself is not can you drink – it is should you drink.

17 comments:

  1. It isn't fair, IMO, to lay the cause of Absolom killing Amnon at the feet of wine. He was killed because he raped his half-sister, Tamar.

    Let's blame the rape.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, that is exactly what I was thinking! This was very dishonest in the reading of the scripture.

      Delete
  2. Well, Jesus being God Almighty, drank and gave us wine. I'll let Him be the judge of that. Seems to be the bible is VERY clear on this subject.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. So very clear that so far I've used about fifty verses that show a negative view of alcohol. Yep, that's clear all right...

      Delete
    2. Actually, you only mentioned drunkenness. The bible forbids drinking in excess.

      If alcohol is the source of drunkenness and should be avoided then the same logic could be applied to food, which causes gluttony. Or even sex, which lead to many different sins.

      Delete
  3. Is this the last blog on alcohol? I have yet to see any argument that Jesus did not drink wine. Why is this being ignored?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I shall answer this one more time. Yes, I have a blog post planned to deal with Jesus and alcohol.

      Delete
  4. Just curious as to how many more you plan to write on this topic? While I think that we may end up disagreeing on the topic, I find it sad that many commenting on this blog post in disagreement are not even talking about the thrust of this blog post. Was Amnon killed because he was drinking? - No, but because he raped Tamar, but he may have been able to prevent himself from being killed if he wasn't drinking. It is obvious from the verses that Absalom was confident he would get drunk. - There must have been a pattern in Amnon's life that Absalom was basing that on. It is obvious to the honest reader of your blog what you were attempting to say. Thank you for taking the time to post thoughts of your studies.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have 12 planned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! 12 more. That will take us into September!

      Delete
    2. 12 total, mi amigo

      Delete
  6. You can always tell which side has the weaker argument. The side that takes quotes out of context. The side that comments on the other's personal motives. The side that twists meaning of intent to fit their position. The side that has to make stronger statements in order to "shout down" sound reasoning.

    Anonymous -- 15 years ago, I found myself having the exact same debate with my wife because I liked to drink every now and then. Once I realized that I was getting angry with her over the issue and she was not angry with me, was the moment I realized I had lost the argument.

    The interesting thing was that my knowledge of the Bible was far stronger than my wife's and she still won the debate. I haven't had a drink since. And this was BEFORE I became an IFB.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "The side that takes quotes out of context."

      Like what?

      "The side that comments on the other's personal motives."

      Sorta like what you are doing?

      "The side that twists meaning of intent to fit their position."

      Wow, seriously?

      "The side that has to make stronger statements in order to "shout down" sound reasoning."

      Is this your "shout down"?


      Delete
    2. That's funny Anonymous. I never actually said you had the weaker argument. You must have figured that out by yourself. Checkmate.

      Delete
    3. Funny, you never really had an argument.

      Game over. :-(

      Delete
  7. Also I wanted to explain my distinction between a “foolish risk” and a “sin”.

    If you’ve committed a sin it means you need to ask God’s forgiveness.
    If something is a foolish risk, you ought to be very careful doing it and thank God when nothing bad happens.

    I don’t believe the Bible says it’s a sin for a single man to kiss a single girl on the mouth. But it can easily lead to more. I think it would be wrong for the IFB to declare unmarried kissing a sin but absolutely right to warn young people on the dangers of kissing. A foolish risk left unwarned is destructive. Labeling risky behavior as a “sin” is also destructive because it can hurt someone’s relationship with God and damage relationships with other believers.

    My mother kept a bottle of Mogan David in the refrigerator for twenty years. It took her 20 years to finish that bottle. She treated herself to a glass of wine maybe twice a year. If scripture doesn’t say she needs to repent and ask forgiveness for drinking that bottle neither will I.

    If I learned she bought another bottle, I would not confront her about it since I don’t believe she is in sin. But if I did, “confronting" is not the same thing as “judging." Confronting is done for loving concern. Passing judgement is done with pride to put someone beneath you.

    However, in light of what I now know about the dangers of alcohol I would choose to silently keep an eye on my mom.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Most all the trouble I got into as a teenager came from drinking alcohol. Car accidents, fights, punching windows. Most all the trouble I see in the lives of families in my church (extended family or siblings) comes from alcohol. Just the other day, I was talking to one of our newer attenders, a Christian Indian, was telling my about his brother who is a drunkard back in India. He's a doctor who picked up imbibing in England, while in college. His marriage is destroyed, practice is destroyed, life is destroyed as he sits rotting away in a sanitarium. I would rather avoid the bottle altogether than risk going back where I came from and even greater than that: influencing my children, who may not be as disciplined as myself in 'responsible drinking'.

    ReplyDelete