|
|
|
|
Only rarely, do I do standalone blog posts. Today, I am going to make that exception with an overview of my reading in 2021, and a number of recommendations for you from that.
Last
year, I read 52 books in their entirety for a total of 21,064 pages. The longest
book, the Bible, was 1,590 pages; the shortest book, E. M. Bounds’ Prayer and
Praying Men was 115 pages. The average length was 405 pages. I rate/review
every book I read on Goodreads. My average rating for 2021 was 3.7 stars.
Here, in no particular order, other than the Bible, are my top ten books for
last year.
Paradise
Lost by John Milton –
The
Temple: Its Ministry and Services by Alfred Edersheim –
Missionary
Partnership: A Brief Biblical Theology of Missions, Deputation, and Partnership by Ben David Sinclair –
The
Conviction to Lead: 25 Principles for Leadership That Matters by R. Albert Mohler Jr. –
Beyond
Suffering: Discovering the Message of Job by Layton Talbert –
The
Reading Life: The Joy of Seeing New Worlds Through Others’ Eyes by C. S. Lewis –
If
God is Good: Faith in the Midst of Suffering and Evil by Randy Alcorn –
Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929-1941 by Stephen Kotkin - Building on his monumental first volume, Kotkin in this volume has added an immense amount of detail to his yet unfinished three volume biography of Stalin. This one begins with Stalin secure in his position as head of Communist Russia. Policy wise, it sees Stalin launch the Soviet Union's massive industrialization with only middling "success" at great price. One particular tractor factory story was illuminating here. On the personal side, we see the continued deterioration of Stalin's family, and his shameful treatment of his second wife (who commits suicide) and his mother.
By far, the two largest story lines in the book are the purges of the late 1930s and the lead up to WWII. The purges are paranoid megalomania at its worst. It is eye-opening how Stalin built a power base that gradually became enslaved to his every whim. The damage he wrought on people's lives and on his own government/state is nigh incalculable. It was worse than his disastrous peasant collectivization a decade before. On the WWII side, we see great detail on the diplomatic dance between Stalin and Hitler, the national greed of both of them, but especially the abysmal failure of Stalin in the military preparedness and intelligence fields.
Though at times, as with any massive work like this, my attention wandered, Kotkin always brought it back. Having read more works than I can count on WWII it was interesting to see events and perspective from the Russian side, their thoughts, concerns, and reactions in context.
Kotkin's is the very definition of a serious work. It is not for the faint of heart. But it isn't an academic work that bores one to tears with recitation of statistics either. It is heavily researched, well written, thorough but not dry, and analytical both about specific events and the arc of Stalin's life as a whole.
The 20th century is one long witness of man's inhumanity to man, of the way power corrupts, and of the need of man for a Saviour with a capital S rather than a small s. Man's inhumanity is so awful there is no solution outside of Christ. Stalin and his nemesis, Hitler, and their contemporary, Mao, represent the worst of humanity. There, but for the grace of God, go I.
Rousseau and Revolution by Will Durant – The scope of Durant's work is mind-boggling. The sheer amount of work he has put into this series is beyond impressive. Though the series has shifted over time from a history of civilization to a history of Europe to a history of France, it is nevertheless priceless. Ten of the eleven are now under my belt and I've spent hundreds of hours with Will Durant. As Durant ages, he reveals more and more of himself. As I wrote in my review of the Voltaire volume, what we find in the senior Durant is a respectful and knowledgeable liberal, a man enamored with the Enlightenment and at heart critical of Christianity and all it represents. We see this yet again in this volume. The place he grants Rousseau in history is entirely out of place, and the credit he pays what was by his own admission a bad man is sorely misplaced. How a man of Durant's caliber and knowledge could see the horror of the French revolution up close and yet still admire the French philosophers is as mind-boggling as the scale of his work.
You will learn lots of things in this book, but learn skeptically. Durant's facts are correct but his interpretation is simply sad.
I think the best Christmas gift to give or receive is a book. It gives hours of entertainment or learning at a very low price. It requires no batteries. Its technology will never be out of date. It will wait patiently until someone picks it up. It can be passed on from person to person and generation to generation. It helps the person who wrote it. It helps the person who gives it. It helps the person who receives and reads it. It enriches all of society.
...so, <grin>, I have several to
recommend for you. These can be bought on Amazon, Kindle, Nook, or iTunes. They are available in paperback, hardback, or digitally. And
I have every confidence in the soundness and helpfulness of their content.
Freed From Sin, A Primer on Holiness
is, as the title suggests, an exploration of what holiness is and is not as
well as a scriptural manual on how to grow into it. This is not a little book,
and I do not apologize for that. I have no interest in being another source of
independent Baptist fluff. Its forty-nine chapters spread over 438 pages are
divided into eight sections discussing and applying nearly 1,000 Scripture
references. I have not written it because I think it will sell; in fact, I
doubt it will. Who reads entire books about holiness these days? I have written
it because it cries to be written. I have written it because God’s people in
this generation are under what is perhaps a fiercer assault of the devil than
any generation has ever been. I have written it because the truths I learned changed
my life foundationally, philosophically, and practically; and that change was
for the better. In short, I have written it to help you because the truths in
it have helped me so very much.
Almost a century ago the independent Baptist movement was born. From its beginning it was deeply marked and widely identified with doctrinal orthodoxy and a vigorous practice. Over the last thirty years that vigorous practice has degenerated seriously in several rather alarming ways. The results of this degeneration are increasingly seen in two mistakes. The first mistake is the tendency on behalf of the brethren to dig in, to admit nothing publicly, and to attack any who assert that something is wrong. In so doing they are simply exacerbating the problem. The second mistake is to overreact. Some overreact by leaving the independent Baptist movement altogether for contemporary Christianity. Others are attempting to transition to some “new” kind of independent Baptist model. In so doing they are abandoning much that is good and ingesting much that is dangerous.
Schizophrenic seeks to take a balanced
approach. On the one hand, it boldly shouts, “We’re right!” On the other hand,
it unhesitatingly confesses, “We’re wrong.” It points to the banners of our strength
and calls on us to lift them high. At the same time, it lifts the rug covering
our dirt and calls on us to clean it up. At all times, it seeks to do this with
a careful adherence to Scripture and a well-researched eye on the facts all
bathed in a spirit of charity.
Jesus was the greatest preacher who ever lived. His greatest sermon was given on a hill overlooking the Sea of Galilee toward the beginning of His ministry. Over the course of three chapters early in the New Testament it offers us both a connection to the Old Testament and an explicit appeal to a new kind of life It balances inward calls to self-examination with eminently practical instructions relating to daily life.
This book is both an explanation of and
an application of that great sermon. Over the course of thirty chapters the
author walks through its sections and emphases. He lays before us the intent of
Jesus’ message by immersing us in His day while at the same time relating that
message to our own. In the process he directly challenges us to live, inwardly
and outwardly, the truths found in the greatest sermon ever preached.
Note: With this post, the short series on screens is concluded. I will take a break between now and the end of the year. A new blog series launches in January. Stay tuned.
Screen Time 6
In last week’s post, I went into some
detail about the specific damage unsupervised access to screen time does to children.
In today’s post, I want to give nine short yet practical ideas for parents in
relation to this. I’m going to move hard and fast so keep up.
First, wisdom says your default screen
position should be negative or suspicious. I am not generally a fan of
suspicious parenting. In this context, though, with the screen time needle
pegged so firmly in the red, I think a child should have to convince you why it
is a good idea for them to have screen time. Make them state a case. Be hard to
win over here.
Two, track screen time. With our
children we used several different approaches. For a while, we gave the
children a number of cards at the beginning of each week. They could play a
card and get some screen time. Once those cards were used up for the week that
was it. Another time, I set up an actual Excel spreadsheet for each child. They
entered the time they spent reading vs. the time they spent on a screen. They
could not spend screen time if they had not purchased it with book time.
Neither one was fool-proof. There are no fool proof easy plans to do this. It
takes parenting. But it needs done, especially when they are young.
Three, be the boss. In every family,
someone is in charge. It does not take long in a grocery store line to spot who
it is either. Be the one in charge in your family.
Fourth, ignore what your children
want, or what their friends have, or what their friend’s parents think is
normal. Our society today is so messed up it is hard to even begin to describe
it. God gave those precious children into your custody for a given period of
time. Your task is to provide for them, protect them, and bring them up in the
nurture and admonition of the Lord. You will answer only to Him for how you did
in this task. It does not matter what everybody else thinks.
Fifth, realize safety can be
accomplished without a smart phone. I am weary of the nonsensical argument that
children must be given a phone with internet access in order to be safe. For
thousands of years, this was not the case. It is not the case now. There are
other good choices. For many years, we kept a flip phone we named Three (for
the third phone). When a kid went somewhere he or she took Three. It was so not
cool. It could text, painfully slow. It had no internet access. It was brilliant.
Now, Three has graduated to a camera phone from Gabb. It can make calls and
take pictures, but it does not have a modem so no internet access. It can text,
but cannot text pictures. It can play music, but the music has to be uploaded physically just like the pictures have to be downloaded physically. It cannot download any apps. And
it costs about twenty-five bucks a month.
Sixth, make your kids read. I could
cite a large number of studies here, but I will resist. Yes, I know no one
reads anymore. So? Have them read anyway. I know your little Oswald is too
active to read. So? I will see you your little Oswald and raise you my son,
Jack. Talk about hyper-active. One of the great accomplishments of my life was
teaching that boy to like reading. It can be done. I do not have space in this
post to describe how to do so. My point here is to encourage it. Reading builds
all kinds of life skills, improves brain health, makes him smarter, and
protects your child from screen addiction. If your child does not read a double
digit number of books every year you are doing it wrong. Yes, I mean every word
of that last sentence.
Seventh, allow your kids to be bored.
Your job description does not include finding something for them to occupy
themselves with every moment. Additionally, studies have shown that
unstructured play time helps children enormously. Let them roam. They will
figure it out. If they keep badgering you, give them a job. They will stop
badgering you. In fact, you should probably give them a job anyway. <grin>
Eighth, do not let society, the media,
their peers, their educators, or their own wishes choose for them; you choose.
Ninth, lead by example. Limit your own
screen time. Take them to the library and bring home a stack of books for
yourself too. Lose your remote control for a month. Be accountable. Be where
you are with who you are with. Cultivate an improved attention span. Resist the
siren song of dopamine. Show them it can be done right.
I make zero claims on parental
infallibility. I have long resisted writing any series or book on parenting or
marriage. I have seen what happens too often to those who do. But what I have
written in this short blog series cries out to be done. Our society is
crumbling, and a large part of that can be laid at the feet of this. Neither
you nor I can change the world, but we can lead ourselves and our families to
do right.
It can be done. And it should.
Screen Time 5
The wisest man who ever lived,
Solomon, tells us, The rod and reproof give wisdom: But a child left to
himself bringeth his mother to shame (Proverbs 29.15). Wisdom is how
something ought to be done. Children are wisdomless, to coin a word. They are,
in Solomon’s parlance, simple. Parents are commissioned by the Lord to teach
their children the three great concepts of knowledge, wisdom, and
understanding. Parents need to do this so that their child will have the right
underlying foundation to make proper decisions on their own as they mature. Train
up a child in the way he should go (Proverbs 22.6). Until a child matures
into an adult, it is the parent’s responsibility to make decisions for the
child in order to protect the child from the negative impact of wisdomless
decisions.
There are, sadly, many parents who
ignore this biblical responsibility, accidentally or practically. In so doing,
they bring destruction upon their children and shame upon themselves. They do
this in several ways. First, as we saw above, they leave their child alone too
much. Second, they follow the wrong parenting advice, unbiblical advice. Third,
they allow the child to marinate in a spiritually unhealthy atmosphere. It is
my contention that the parents of this generation all too often combine all of
these mistakes into one by allowing children entirely too much screen time.
Further, this disastrous parenting philosophy is working its way more and more
into the church. Take your child to any independent Baptist youth conference
and marvel at how many teenagers have unfiltered internet access on their
phones, for example.
Screens are an attractive resource for
parents. They help to keep a child quiet when they are left to themselves. They
are educational, and help to prepare the child for a technologically advanced
world. Screens are entertaining and fun; children love them. Screens make
parenting easier. So we place the screen into their hands, on their desks, and
in their lives. Then we go about our business thinking we have fulfilled our
parenting responsibilities without ever thinking through how much that decision
is going to cost them.
Well, let me tell you what it will
cost them.
First, it will cost them a growing
dopamine addiction. Dopamine is a chemical used throughout our body, but
primarily in our brain as a neurotransmitter. I am not a brain scientist
(though I did interview one in preparation for this series) but my understanding
is that dopamine signals the desirability of something, for lack of a better
phrase. It is a physical substance that can be increased or affected by the
choices we make and the things we do. It can also be chemically manipulated to
make someone feel something very desirable, a high, so to speak.
This is exactly what cocaine, meth,
Ritalin, Adderall, ecstasy, and numerous other drugs do. They do not produce
physical addiction like opioids do, necessarily, but they do produce a strong
craving or desire to repeat the high.
Most unfortunately, the same dopamine
rush or high that is transmitted through our brains by controlled substances is
also transmitted via various screen activities. Gaming produces dopamine.
Social media likes produce dopamine. Viewing pornography produces dopamine. In
fact, studies have shown that excessive screen use by young people damages
their brain in the exact same way that frequent cocaine use does.
In 2012, Dr. Lei of the Chinese Academy of
Sciences compared the brains of people diagnosed with Internet Addiction
Disorder with those of healthy people. His study, published in the “Public
Library of Science” found that IAD subjects had brains that had morphed from
normal brains into brains similar to people who had substance abuse issues. In
other words, screen addiction looks exactly like drug addiction in the brain.
Screens are digital crack. Other studies done in 2013 and 2014 found similar
correlations.
In 2012, psychologists Patterson and
Hoffman began experimenting at the University of Washington on ways to reduce
pain in burn victims without using opioids. They discovered that when patients
play video games their pain sensations greatly decreased because so much
dopamine was flowing through their brain.
Regarding gaming, Dr. Peter Whybrow,
UCLA’s director of the Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behaviour calls
computer games electronic cocaine. Commander Dr. Doan, US Navy, says that
gaming activates the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. This is the
adrenaline rush that comes with gaming. Blood pressure rises, palms get sweaty,
pupils constrict. That combination of adrenaline and dopamine is potent and
highly addictive.
Gaming companies, of course, are aware of
this. They purposely design their games to induce as much of it as possible. In
other words, computer and video games are engineered to be addictive. Dr. Doan
says, “Gaming companies will hire the best neurobiologists and neuroscientists
to hook up electrodes to the test-gamer. If they don’t elicit the blood pressure
that they shoot for – typically 180 over 120 or 140 within a few minutes of
playing, and if they don’t show sweating and an increase in galvanic skin
responses, they go back and tweak the game to get the maximum addicting and
arousing response that they’re looking for.”
In my conversation with the brain
scientist I mentioned earlier, Dr. Grace Fox, she used this illustration to
explain it. Sugar, like controlled substances, also produces a dopamine rush
and is addictive. That sugar-induced dopamine rush trains us to go back to the
peanut butter cookie when we want to feel that way. Additionally, this is not
isolated to just that decision. Dopamine use affects the portion of our brain
that helps us to make all decisions, reducing its neutrality, so to speak. The
brain is plastic; it is moldable or trainable. The younger you are the more
plastic it is. In other words, the younger you train your brain to chase
dopamine highs the more deeply that chase is embedded in you for the rest of
your life.
Never mind all that, though. Game on.
Second, unmitigated screen time will
create in your child an inability to focus, to think, and to reason. In other
words, your child will look a lot like those who are diagnosed with ADHD.
The more you stimulate a child to get attention the more you must stimulate that child to get attention. We see this societally in the difference between children’s television programming when I was a child – think Mr. Rogers here – and now – think Sponge Bob Squarepants now. It is undeniably factual that the rates of focus inability began to rise off the charts with the advent of television with all of its rapid screen changes and perspectives. That chart defying rise exponentially increased with the advent of the internet, with all its gaming, streaming, and frantic page scrolling and linking.
Dr. Victoria Dunckley, a child
psychiatrist, found pediatric bipolar disorder increased four thousand percent
from 1994 to 2003, and that between 1987 and 2007 diagnosis of ADHD increased
by eight hundred percent. Her working theory is that when a child interacts
with a screen it shifts his nervous system into fight or flight mode. This, in
turn, produces biological and hormonal disorganization, which, in its own turn,
leads to ADHD, depression, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, and anxiety.
Would you care to guess how she treats her
patients? With six week tech fasts. Eighty percent of the time the treatment is
effective, reducing the symptoms I have just described by half. Yet most child
psychiatrists treat such conditions with medication, numbing their patient into
functional zombiehood. Further, they do this with very little in the way of
long term studies on the result of prescribing young people such drugs.
Earlier in this series I referenced Dr. Nicholas
Kardaras. He found that ninety percent
of the children he classifies with attentional, behavioral, emotional,
or developmental problems also have a problematic relationship with screens.
In 2010, a study was done at Iowa State
University and later published in the journal “Pediatrics.” It assessed 1,323
middle school kids over a thirteen month period. It concluded that viewing
television and playing video games is directly associated with increased
subsequent attention problems in childhood. That same year, the Kaiser Family
Foundation released a study showing that children between eight and eighteen
spend seven and half hours a day in front of screens and another one and a half
hours texting. Surely the past decade has not seen those numbers decline. And
then we wonder why we have an ADHD epidemic?
When you condition the mind to become
accustomed to high levels of input reality becomes boring. Is that what you are
doing to your child?
The third cost of excessive screen time in
children is loneliness and depression.
Social media is supposed to be the new
form of community. Tech is supposed to increase our ability to communicate.
Both community and communicate have the word “commune” as their root. But the
simple fact is social media use and texting make kids feel lonelier, not more
connected.
Americans send, on average, six billion
texts a day. The younger the American the more they text. A 2011 Pew Research
Poll found that phone users between the ages of eighteen and twenty-four
exchange an average of 109 messages per day. But we are lonelier and more
depressed than ever. In 2014, Dr. Twenge of San Diego State University,
analyzed data on 7,000,000 people. He concluded we are more likely to be
depressed now than in the 1980s. The World Health Organization has predicted
that depression will be second only to heart disease as the leading cause of
disability globally. Further, it found that suicide rates are up sixty percent
over the past fifty years.
What does this have to do with social
media and texting? Well, the truth is these things often isolate us rather than
connect us. They give the illusion of connection, so to speak. The constant
notification pings on my phone promise me people are paying attention to me and
care about me. That promise is often a mirage.
In 2015, the Pew Research Center published
a study by the American Psychological Association of 400 8th to 11th
graders. It found that only thirty-five percent socialize face to face compared
to sixty-three percent who socialize mainly through text message, averaging 167
texts per day. In 2014, the University of Innsbruck published a study in the
journal “Computers in Human Behavior.” In it, researchers Greitmayer and
Sagioglou found that the longer people are on Facebook the more negative their
mood is afterward. They related this to what they call social comparison. We
compare the negative parts of our life to the mostly positive portrayals we see
on social media and get depressed. Well, why do people continue to use social
media in such numbers if it makes them feel so badly afterward? The addictive
power of dopamine. The same reason you eat another piece of chocolate cake even
though you hate how fat you have become.
Case Western Reserve University School of
Medicine published a study on hypernetworking – spending three hours or more
per school day on social networks. It found that such students had higher rates
of depression, more substance abuse, poor sleep, stress, poor academics, and
were more suicidal. In relation to specifics, it found hyper-networked students
were sixty-nine percent more likely to be sexually active, sixty percent more
likely to have four or more partners, eighty-four percent more likely to have
used illegal drugs, and ninety-four percent more likely to have been involved
in a physical fight.
Dr. Kardaras says, “I’ve done probably
about two dozen suicide risk assessments over the last couple of years;
invariably, the depressed and suicidal young person is a plugged in social
media devotee.”
See? A child left to himself bringeth
his mother to shame.
How much time do your children spend doing
what on a screen?
Screen Time 4
In early 19th century
England, the invention of the steam engine revolutionized movement. Humans
being the inventive creatures they are, it was not long before someone thought
of putting one into a carriage so that it could be propelled forward without
horses. Usually we relate steam engines to trains, but this technology was also
repeatedly tried in passenger cars for decades. The Stanley Steamer, anyone? At
any rate, as this new tech made its way into society the powers that be were
concerned at what it would do. They lobbied Parliament for regulation
successfully, and in 1865 the Locomotive Act was passed. One of a number of
similar bills, this one was designed to limit the damage steam propelled moving
vehicles could cause to roads, animals, and people. In order to do so, it
limited automobiles to a speed of four miles per hour in the country and two
miles per hour in town. Further, it required that the cars being driven in town
be crewed by three people, a driver, a stoker, and a man walking sixty yards
ahead with a red flag to warn others that danger was approaching. Behold, the
dubious birth of the phrase “red flag” as an indication of something
approaching that is dangerous.
In last week’s post I indicated a
number of ways that in my view are an appropriate use of your screen time. In
this post, I do not plan to do the exact opposite for the number of ways you
can misuse your screen time is too numerous to list. Instead, I propose to
offer you four red flags. If you notice one of these in your life it is a clear
sign that your screen time is becoming dangerous.
The first of these is relatively
simple, but hard to admit. If you turn off your screen as soon as someone comes
into the room, and then act like it was
not on in the first place you are in trouble. It may or may not be related to
what you were just doing on it, but even if the use is relatively innocent it
is indicative of the fact you know you should not have been on it. I am not
talking about the common courtesy of putting away your electronic device in the
presence of others. I am talking about doing that while pretending you had been
doing something else all along. The heart is deceitful and desperately
wicked, Jeremiah said. Are you being deceptive in an effort to cover up how
much time you spend on it?
The second red flag is more subjective
but also more troubling. Do you find yourself getting fidgety without your
screen? Do your hands keep reaching for it? Does your mouse automatically click
over to your web browser? Do you get nervous when you cannot find the remote
control?
It is no secret I read widely. Along
with the books I cited earlier in this series, I have also read thousands of
pages on the history of television, and the rise of Google and Facebook. You do
not have to believe what I am going to say next but I dare you to try to
disprove it. Internet browsers are specifically designed to be addictive.
Social media is specifically designed to be addictive. Television is
specifically designed to be addictive. Video games are specifically designed to
be addictive. Your screens come with hooks. The more time and the more length
of time you have spent on those screens the more deeply those hooks are
embedded in your brain.
I go on a prayer retreat every year.
There are several reasons I do, but one of them is to force myself to reckon
with just how much I am attached to checking social media on my laptop, and
tapping the apps on my phone. You do not have to go to that extreme, but if you
find yourself fidgeting when you cannot use or look at a screen I propose you
unplug yourself from it for a while. Institute a phone free Tuesday each week.
Make people contact you the old fashioned way, you know, the actual phone. Unplug
your television and face it to the wall. Leave your phone behind when you leave
the house. Less extreme but still helpful, disable all the notifications on
your phone or your laptop. Do not let emails and texts and messages rule your
interrupted life. You decide when you are going to look at them. Track the screen
time you spend on your apps and take the ones off your phone that you spend the
most time on. You do not have to throw your gaming computer into the
Mississippi River, but you do need to be in charge of your own life. Use
screens, do not be used by them.
The third red flag is common these
days. I often wish I had a literal one to pull out and wave in front of people.
When you stay involved with your screen in the presence of your family, your
friends, or your church you are in trouble. I am not one of those who divide
screen time from other time, labeling one fake and the other real life. I have
real relationships online. But the people in front of me are the ones that are
important. I never bring my phone to the dinner table when I am eating with
others, unless it is to have a clock to watch my time for appointment reasons.
I may or may not have my phone in my pocket at church, but if I do I only pull
it out to answer a question from a living, breathing human being in front of
me. Not only is it rude to others for you to be on your screen in their
presence, it is distracting to you. How can you possibly focus on them when
your screen is singing its siren song in your head the whole time?
Multi-tasking, you say. Asinine ridiculousness, I say, and I have read the
studies that show it. Be where you are. Be with who you are with. Deep
relationships demand quality time. Give them the quality of your time, not just
the amount of it.
The fourth red flag is the most
dangerous of all. You are in trouble with your screen time when you refuse to
be accountable for it. For eleven years, Mandy and I shared the same Facebook
page. I kind of miss that, though I realize why she got her own and I agree
with her about it. There should be no message or text or email you erase.
Passwords and passcodes should be known and shared between family members.
Browsing history, digital movie rentals and purchases, online shopping orders,
all of these and more should be open and available for inspection.
Many years ago, I instituted a financial
policy of openness at our church in Chicago. If you were a tithing member, you
were welcome to look at any and all of our financial documents with the
exception of personal giving records. If you wanted to look at the check book
you could. If you wanted to leaf through the credit card statements or the bank
statements, you could. If you wanted to see our property deeds, those were
available too. Loan docs? Investment records? We had nothing to hide. Providing
for honest things, not only in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of
men (II Corinthians 8.21). Curiously enough, in all the years that policy
was in force no one ever asked. Because they could and they knew it. Churches
that are not open with their members about finances are in trouble, and people
who are not open with their loved ones about their screen time are in even more
trouble.
The worst lie is the one you tell
yourself.
What lies are you telling yourself
about your screen time?
Screen Time 3
Screens – whether in a theater, your
living room, your desk, your chair, or your hand – are morally neutral. What we
do with those screens is not. It is good or evil. In last week’s post we
discussed nine scriptural tests to establish whether our screen time is good or
bad. Three of those nine tests were positive. In other words, it is certainly
possible to use the screens in your life in a good way. Those three positive
tests included that screen time can be used to edify, to redeem the time, and
for good, with the consensus of my counsellors. That being the case, what are
some specific applications of my screen time for good?
First, you can use screen time to
connect with others who are distant. Life is not stuff or accomplishments or
bucket lists; life is relationships. What matters in our life is the
relationships we have and the condition of those relationships. The most
important of our relationships is with God, and it is interesting in this
context to see He set up access to Him to be entire, complete, and
instantaneous. In other words, we can get in touch with God anytime anywhere. Like
all relationships, our relationship with Him waxes and wanes. When it wanes, it
is never because He has made a mistake or removed Himself from us. The onus is
always on us to restore and rebuild a declining relationship with Him.
Technology has improved our ability to
restore, maintain, and rebuild relationships with others in a similar manner to
our relationship with God. We can now practically contact any person at any
time in any place. While geography still limits relationships, it does not have
to end them for all intents and purposes. I can and do maintain rather close
relationships with people thousands of miles away from me by means of screen
time. In fact, I have close relationships with people I have never even met in
real life. This seems strange to our parents generation, odd to our own, but
perfectly normal to our children.
Additionally, you can connect with
people not just geographically removed from you but emotionally removed from
you. If you have a sundered relationship with a family member a gentle yet
constant interaction via text or video or email can do much to restore that
relationship. Jeremiah said, Mine eye affecteth my heart (Lamentations
3.51). Missionaries can emotionally connect with our church via social
media. Grandparents can emotionally connect with far-flung grandchildren. Older
pastors can build mentoring relationships with younger men in ministry via
online communication.
Is this beneficial? Absolutely.
Indeed, I would argue that improving family relationships and building solid
friendships is edifying.
Second, you can use your screen time
to encourage and minister. This one is closely connected with the previous one.
For example, you can encourage people you do not know or do not know well by
passing along some good news. We swim around all day in Bad News Lake. It is
the environment in which we live and breathe. Solomon said, The light of the eyes rejoiceth the heart: And
a good report maketh the bones fat. As cold waters to a thirsty soul, So is
good news from a far country (Proverbs 15.30, 25.25). What a blessing it is
to me to scroll my social media newsfeeds of a Sunday and see pictures of
families dressed up for church and reports of salvations and baptisms at
various places around the world. How encouraging it is to hear summations of
sermons right and left. And that is just one example.
How often have you read a missionary
letter that contained prayer requests? While your response could have been,
“Absolutely, I will be honored to pray with you about that” you could not share
this thought with that missionary. But if he posts the same request on social
media you can share that response. To pray for someone in need, and to
communicate that compassionately and sincerely is balm for the soul.
Third, you can use your screen time to
take a stand for truth. Social media is all about putting yourself out there,
displaying your world, giving your opinion about everything. While that is
often problematic, the truth is the social media space has become the town hall
or party line of previous generations. So what do you do when opinions are
flying around right and left, and when much of that expressed opinion is
biblically ignorant if not ungodly? You can take a stand for truth.
Controversy for controversy’s sake or attention’s
sake is unwise, but to rule out being controversial for that reason is to rule
out taking a stand in the modern public square. If you believe the truth but
never say it, the truth dies with you. If you say the truth but never where
anyone can hear it but those who are already convinced, the truth dies with you.
It is foolish to stay quiet online by hiding behind the excuse of wisdom. It is
cowardly to discuss every area of truth except the area currently being
fiercely debated. I am not saying you have to fight everybody. I am not saying
you have to fight all the time. I am not saying you have to be reactionary. I
am not saying you have to be harsh. I am saying you ought to take a stand.
Fourth, you can use screen time to
study and teach the truth. Study in our day almost always involves a screen at some point. I believe
based on both experience and research that hearing from a teacher in an in
person environment is the best mode of learning. Further, I think books are a
better means of in-depth study than video for several important reasons. But
having said that, I sure have learned a lot from YouTube, as funny as it
sounds. I have taken online classes several places. Additionally, many of the study aids I use
the most are actually more searchable and instantaneously available on my
screen than they are in my library. I spend probably 50 hours a month listening
to my phone as it reads me the Bible or some other book. I do that while I am
hiking or eating lunch or driving or otherwise physically but not mentally engaged.
I would argue that is time well and profitably spent.
Not only can you learn effectively
with a screen you can also teach effectively. I have three books in print and a
fourth being published now. All of those I wrote on screens. I have hundreds of
thousands of words available online about various topics on my blog. I make
about 1,300 of my sermon outlines available to my Patreon subscribers. I have
hundreds of audio sermons available for free on my church website. I send
hundreds more at no charge to Brennan’s Pulpit subscribers. I send 15,000
emails out a month with free content. Why? I want to make as much of the truth
God has taught me as widely available as possible.
Then there is this, too. In addition
to making truth available on a screen you can explain it. You can answer
someone’s objections in a patient, detailed manner. You can interact with them,
seeking to bring them to an understanding of and ownership of the truth that
long ago laid hold on you.
Fifth, you can use your screen time to
appreciate and display God’s beauty. As I write this, a blue bird is bouncing
on a slight pine branch within my field of vision. He has been hopping around
all morning, sounding his slightly mad, slightly happy note. Yesterday, while
on a prayer walk, I startled several deer. I watched their white tails bounding
away into the brush. Late last night, I sat on my deck and gloried. It was a
clear, cold night and the stars glittered like a thousand jewels strewn
carelessly across an upside down velvet cloth. I find such things marvelous. The
heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament sheweth his handywork
(Psalm 19.1). God’s Word tells me to think on lovely things and praise the
Lord as a result (Philippians 4.8). Screens let me share these moments
with others, provoking them, in turn, to praise the Lord. Screens can even
bring me such moments. Did you know that the whales off the South African
coastline catch fish in nets made of bubbles? I learned that on a screen. It is
amazing how intricate and creative and beautiful our God is.
Sixth, you can use your screen time to
remember in future days God’s goodness to you now. The psalmist was often
deeply discouraged. One of the ways he encouraged himself was to remember
previous occasions of God’s goodness and blessing. O my God, my soul is cast
down within me: therefore will I remember thee From the land of Jordan, and of
the Hermonites, from the hill Mizar (Psalm 42.6). I have a spreadsheet on
my computer with a list of rather important answers to prayer on it. I
routinely look at my Facebook memories so I can recall past blessings. Yes, I
am sentimental, but there is wisdom and profit here.
Last but not least, you can use your
screen time to make a living. I believe that all work (assuming it is not ungodly
in some way) is honorable work. I do not believe that my pastoral work is
better than your office job. In all labour there is profit (Proverbs 14.23).
There is a dignity to work that is ennobling to all men. If that is the
case, and it inarguably is, then online work or remote work or work somehow
done on a screen is as honorable as work done on a farm. You can sell products
online. You can produce content worth paying for. You can be smart enough that
someone wants to pay you for your mind, and what that mind does on a screen.
Certainly, the way you make a living on a screen should not violate biblical
principles such as vanity, modesty, or excess, but let us assume there is
nothing unscriptural about the way you make money with a screen. Then go to it.
Work hard at it. Do well. Improve and grow and build. Such things are all to
the good, beloved.
I said last a moment ago, but now here
at the end I have found I do not really mean it. I highly suspect there are
numerous other good things that can and should be done with screen time which I
have failed to think of. If one comes to your mind I would be obliged if you
would share it with me. If you do I will have learned something profitable.
Probably by way of a screen. And it will be good.
See? <grin>